Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
> > I've changed some of the behaviour of release. If the file is not > > up-to-date, it now displays (unless -q/-Q is specified) a quick status > > message (so you can see just what files have been altered). > Please note that > > It can't know that without running on the server - you'd need to write a > whole client/server release mechanism to handle that kind of status. > > The current behaviour is good enough (can't change it too much anyway as > frontends rely on its output). If modifying the switch statement works > then that's the way to solve it... we only need a count of modified > files and exactly how we get that doesn't really matter. ok. in that patch I sent you, just remove (or better yet #if 0/#endif) the block if (!quiet && status!=T_REMOVE_ENTRY && status!=T_UPTODATE) { ... } Or alternatively, how about adding a new command line flag so that more verbose info can be shown? I think its quite useful to be able to run release and see what files it says are anything but up-to-date. The rest can stay (its nice to have the trace output so you can see what the heck is going on). I guess you'll also want to zap that small change so "You have [%d] altered files" does says 'file' when there is only 1 modified file :( Cheers, David