Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Krzysztof, > We have found serious bug while performing two RTAG operations in > parallel. Performing two RTAG operations in parallel is not a 'typical' workflow - therefore it is quite likely there is a much much better (more efficient and more supported) way to achieve the same result. If you can send a post to the mailing list explaining WHY you need to tag the same files with two different tags - describing in as much detail as possible your business process and the desired outcome in business terms (ie: the desired outcome is NOT two tags on the same revision, but maybe the ability to query xyz, etc etc) then we can probably provide some helpful pointers to you. > The scenario is as follows: > 1) process 1 opens file and locks file > 2) process 2 opens file > 3) process 1 modifies file, unlocks an closes file > 4) process 2 locks file and modifies file overwriting modifications of > first process because it has opened file before locking it! OK we've created bug 5644 to track this and Tony has created a patch for 2.5.05 (branch CVSNT_2_0_x) - we are still testing this: http://customer.march-hare.com/webtools/bugzilla/ttshow_bug.cgi?tt=1&id=5644 Whilst this IS a bug and it WILL be fixed, I'm sure that there is a better way to achieve your required business outcomes than performing parallel RTAG's. I look forward to your post. Regards, Arthur Barrett