Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Hi, In DoCVSThread, the handle passed as the parameter is eventually released with a call to CloseHandle(). The handle created by accept() does not seem to be completely released by CloseHandle(). With each TCP protocol request the service's handle count goes up by one. Requests over the named pipe do not make the service leak. Using closesocket() on handles created by accept() seems to solve the handle leaks, however CloseHandle() still needs to be used on the named pipe's handle. Passing the handle from the named pipe to closesocket() does not seem to release the named pipe's handle. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list Cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs