[cvsnt] Feature request: Commitable tags

Oliver Koltermann okoltermann at gmx.de
Mon Apr 28 16:47:44 BST 2003


Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.


"Oliver Giesen" <ogware at gmx.net> writes:

> > >BTW: What would happen if I do a checkout -f on a branch tag and
> > >then commit changes to a file that previously did not have that
> > >branch tag? Would the branch automatically be created for that
> > >file?
> 
> Well, long story short, I just tested and I actually get the error message:
> "cvs server: Up-to-date check failed for `test.txt'". That's probably
> consistent and I could very well live it but I also currently don't see much
> of a risk in implementing the abovementioned functionality instead (possibly
> controlled by another switch).

I remember it used to say something different like: No branch xyz for
file test.txt in older revisions. That sounded more logical to me. It
didn't say it directly but it asked the user for the suggestion
"branch or trunk". Either create the branch for the file and then try
again or explicitly "update -A".

That's not fine - I thought the old output could be clearer but now
it's even more general... not even talking about branch tags :-(

Sorry, just thought that someone cares...

bye,
  OK.


More information about the cvsnt mailing list
Download the latest CVSNT, TortosieCVS, WinCVS etc. for Windows 8 etc.
@CVSNT on Twitter   CVSNT on Facebook