[cvsnt] ntserver vs. local

Glen Starrett grstarrett at cox.net
Wed Dec 10 05:30:23 GMT 2003


Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.


> Problem is we're running 1.11 of cvsnt and we're running up against 
> organizational issues getting it upgraded to 2.0.x. Can we 
> simply change 
> our cvs clients to access it using the local access method:
> 
>    f:/cvs
> 
> (...assuming f is mapped to \\serverx\c\cvs -- or can we also 
> use a UNC 
> path?)

I would highly discourage that.  That would start having your clients use a
C/S system back in file-share mode which is much slower, which could lead to
timing problems (and obviously performance issues).  You should move to SSPI
protocol if you're changing protocols.

Can't use a UNC path in any case.

Any more specifics on _why_ you want to change to local from ntserver?  It's
deprecated, but SSPI should take it's place nicely.  Someone just posted
within the last few days some info on changing the ROOT file directly to
update existing sandbox protocols from ntserver to SSPI, if that's any help.

Regards,

Glen Starrett





More information about the cvsnt mailing list
Download the latest CVSNT, TortosieCVS, WinCVS etc. for Windows 8 etc.
@CVSNT on Twitter   CVSNT on Facebook