Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Björn Carlsson wrote: > One more question, what is the difference, with this new binary diff > thing, I can't notice the difference? I thought it should only store the Some file sizes from my test data (3 generations of different debug builds of cvs.exe): Original file: 1,249,280 (*3 = 3,747,840) RCS file -kb: 2,784,711 (25% compression) RCS file -kB: 1,988,855 (47% compression) RCS file -kBz: 703,696 (82% compression) If you take into account in the uncompressed versions there's a full copy of the file in the head revision, the compression per delta is: -kb: 39% compression -kB: 71% compression That's quite reasonable IMO - to go higher would probably introduce too much of a performance penalty, although there's room for tweaking. Tony