Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Oliver Giesen wrote: >>I would strongly discourage this, as it goes against the purpose of >>using SSH in the first place. >> >> > >Did you notice the "optionally" in my suggestion? I was thinking about >something like having to tick a non-persistent checkbox on a command dialog >(aka an option on the commandline) to suppress (i.e. auto-confirm) the >message. This way it would still have to be a fully conscious action. > Sorry, I'll have to read more carefully :-) >>I think (but then I am bound to say that >>:-) that the TortoisePlink approach is a lot better in that respect... >> >> > >I haven't used Tortoise for quite some time, and don't feel the need to do >so any time soon (no offence meant - I was very impressed when I tried it >but I'm simply content with WinCvs at the moment). Thus, what IS the >TortoisePlink approach? > TortoisePlink is a slightly modified version of plink which pops up a dialog box for questions like this. This avoids the situation where the user cannor reply to the message because stdin is redirected. -Torsten