Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Just a thought on plans to back CVSNT with a "real" data store. Why not place an abstraction layer or 2 between CVSNT and the store (essentially making the software 3-4 tier)? If an object (Java Bean, COM+ server app, stand-alone exe) sits between CVSNT and the store, then probably any store could be used, as long as it supported say something minimal like SQL-92. CVSNT wouldn't have to know it was talking to something other than the filesystem at all. The first data-access layer would take the CVSNT command, wash it through a regex to make sure it was "SQL palatable" and the second would run the command against the store; no stored procedures (initially?). Maybe CVSNT could be recompiled to the .NET Framework, running under MS's CLR on Win32 and Mono on OS-X/FreeBSD/Linux. I think it might be easier then to abstract data access to a database vs fileystem and back, again with the idea that any SQL-compliant store could be used. I think that would get away from the problem "what database to bind to?" and make it the end user's problem. :) Or if going down the MSSQL/MSDE route, perhaps require the installation of the SQLXML extensions. Then CVSNT could make SOAP or simple UpdateGram/DiffGram calls to the database. I imagine there would be an additional speeed penalty, especially with bin files, as things are serialized or wrapped in XML. But if you want wide-area source control, SQLXML over HTTP(s) would do it. Btw, MSDE is just MSSQL, but 1. There is a hardcoded process governor that allows 5 simultaneous requests (not threads, requests) to run simultaneously, reqs 6+ must queue 2. It's free 3. There are no GUI client tools (but the same COM-callable interface is there to do work and if you get them somewhere else you can use them on MSDE) 4. I don't think it supports named instances, not that they would be necessarily needed by CVSNT 5. Single database size is limited to 2gb but if a module == a database that wouldn't have to be a problem But I think doing MSDE/MSSQL would kill CVSNT on the *nix side of the house, not a good thing. Hope that helps somebody do something. :) stevec at atomic9.net