Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
> Tony, when you have two products in front of you (CVS and CVSNT) and > products that use CVS explicitly steer you away from CVSNT Which products would that be? If you're alluding to the ViewCvs/WebCvs issues reported lately, there were fixes to them within *days* from both Tony *and* the ViewCvs team. Tony even went to lengths writing an RCS emulation layer for those that didn't just upgrade their ViewCvs installation. > and then you give > it a try anyway and the thing will not install and then when you do install > it the clients don't work, Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't remember you ever saying anything useful about the "clients don't work" issue. Maybe we could help you at that point? > take a guess which is the simpler path? Dicking > around with the DOS product or moving to the original. DOS? Now you're getting outright infantile... > I am sure it's a fine > product and all and you should all be commended for making the effort, but > when somebody complains and all the babies start crying You didn't get the point. The crying (or "ass-kissing" as you prefered to call it in your other post) was about people who *successfully* installed CVSNT based on Bo's instructions who thus wanted to prevent him from taking the docs off the net just because *you* weren't successful with them. Bo himself outlined under which circumstances those docs came into existence and that they currently /are/ not up to date. Just take a look at the state of the official Cederqvist wrt up-to-date-ness. That's what *I* call pathetic. If it takes them years(!) to even add one minor new feature they still couldn't be bothered to put it in the docs?! Well, they're of course still better than the majority of Open Source documentation out there which is simply non-existant at all... go figure... > and you IGNORE the > issue Huh? A new release with the installer issue fixed was out within the next day(!). Doesn't look like ignoring the issue to me at all! How many open source projects do *you* know that offer this kind of response time? > it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why the problems > persist. It also doesn't take even so much as finishing elementary school to see why you were banned for the comments in your other post... so long... Oliver