Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
> It still doesn't require them to merge from trunk to branch > prior to merging > back from branch to trunk. They perform the merge from > branch to a sandbox they > have moved to trunk. Until that works 100%, they have to fix > it on their > branch. Once they are satisfied, then _you_ merge from their > branch to trunk > and then _you_ can commit to trunk. Same diff, but without > any spurious commits > to the repository. But the easiest way to get a non-trivial merge to merge in cleanly is to do as I've outlined, I think. Do you now of a better way? I would think that with the method you're proposing the dev would be manually merging code changes into the dev branch instead of CVS automatically merging most of the updates + a little manual conflict resolution, which seems like a lot more trouble. I can certainly live with the workaround for inspection and knowing there is nothing wrong with the merges gives me peace of mind. An extra bump on the rev is no big deal as long as the why is understood. Regards, Glen Starrett