Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Hi Tony, > Glen Starrett wrote: > > I certainly agree there should be some better solution, but I don't > > know > > what it is. Falling back to the "it's not recommended to commit > > binaries" doesn't really work in practice in a lot of cases. > > > > Tony, do you have some recommendation for this? > > The code does an implicit -kk where necessary but this > doesn't work in > all cases (mostly due to the way the files are stored). -k-v > might work > but it likely to have some of the same issues. I obviously don't understand the intracacies of what's being done in the code so forgive me if the following comment seems naïve. Specifically, why is it not just sufficient to *ignore* the -kk behaviour for files that are tagged as binary (i.e., added with -kb) in the repository? The result would be exactly what I'd want in my mixed binary/text repository with an "update -kk -j". Cheers, -David > Ultimately the files are different and it's a lot harder than > simple -k > options... it may require a custom diff to be able to ignore certain > differences (something I started working on but haven't done > much with). > > Tony > _______________________________________________ > cvsnt mailing list > cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt cvsnt downloads at march-hare.com https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs @CVSNT on Twitter CVSNT on Facebook >