Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Tony Hoyle wrote: > ACLs at the current level will always take priority over ACLs higher up > - the search basically stops there because you have set default none on > the directory, and no other override. That got me thinking... is there a difference in performance between using the recursive nature of the ACLs and set them only in their respective top level directories (faster at the one time of setting, but possibly slower on every access) or use the -R option and explicitly set the ACLs in all subdirectories (slower at the time of setting, but possibly faster on normal accesses)? In one case, cvsnt would always have to scan the permissions files up the directory chain on every access, in the other case it always would find an ACL that fits a user in every directory. Gerhard