Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Bo Berglund wrote: > TH> Yes. Unedit rolls back to the last edit. > > But is it correct? > > IMHO This makes commit option '-e' useless. Look. It is a real > situation when i do a serial of changes and after that "release" file > (notify other developers that i don't edit that file anymore). So i > have done many commits, but system persist that i lose my changes. And > more it revert my changes back (not in a repository but in a sandbox). Whether this is "correct" depends on what you define to be "correct" :) The thing is that different systems define this differently. VSS for example resets the revision that's stored for the unedit when you do its "commit and leave edited" equivalent, whereas cvsnt doesn't touch the backed up unedit revision. I'm not sure what application scenario the "commit -e" option is intended to address; so far, I can't remember one being described -- while there are some valid uses for a command compatible to the sequence cvs commit <module list> cvs edit <module list> which is different from "commit -e". Gerhard