Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Ok, sorry to keep bothering you, but I still don't fully understand. BTW, my repository consists of close to 50 subdirs - I just didn't want to type 6-50 <g> So, the rtag will lock in the top-level directory every time, unless I am only locking in the lower directory?? And a checkout will do the same, only with a readlock? keith d. zimmerman, mcsd eagle solutions -----Original Message----- From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:tmh at nodomain.org] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:37 PM To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org Subject: Re: [cvsnt] More on locking Keith D. Zimmerman wrote: > Given a repository > > /a > /1 > /2 > /b > /5 > /6 > /7 > /8 > /9 > > And a module defined as > all -a a b > > Doing > cvs rtag -b all > > Results in 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 being locked the entire time that the > rtag is being performed on b. Now, in our case, the code in 5-9 is > not dependant on each other - is there a way to setup the modules so > we could do the rtag command but have it only lock one folder at a > time. In this case simply do it as different rtag commands... there aren't too many directories. You might even be able to get away with all -a a b/5 b/6 b/7 b/8 b/9 .. but I'm not sure whether you'll get the right directory structure if you do that. Possibly: cvs rtag -b a b/5 b/6 b/7 b/8 b/9 Tony _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list cvsnt at cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt cvsnt downloads at march-hare.com https://www.march-hare.com/cvspro/en.asp#downcvs @CVSNT on Twitter CVSNT on Facebook