Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Matt Schuckmann wrote: > While I agree that there is rarely (possibly never) any reason for a user to > require a specific revision number I don't agree that revision numbers are > strictly internal. They are available as an external data point, but the manipulation of revision numbers is strictly an internal artifact of the way CVS keeps track of branches, vendor branches, and changes. You are free to refer to $Revision 1.2.4.113$ of a certain file, but the point is that if you change that revision according to your own Version needs, you may very well break what CVS does internally. Does that make more sense? John