Community technical support mailing list was retired 2010 and replaced with a professional technical support team. For assistance please contact: Pre-sales Technical support via email to sales@march-hare.com.
Ok I see the -s option now the discription is a bit vague "-s Short patch - one liner per file." This means nothing to me. How about something like: "-s Show only changed/removed/added file names and revisions" And Tony our origonal post said to try cvs log -S -R which was a nice try but a bit off. All in all it looks like the rdiff -s option does the trick but you need to have a Branch Point Tag. If you don't include a second -r option it does default to HEAD which is not the same thing as the branch point. It sounds like your working on it though Tony. Thanks Matt S. "Charles L. Farbstein" <charlie.farbstein at titan.com> wrote in message news:mailman.605.1112226568.2568.cvsnt at cvsnt.org... > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:19, Oliver Giesen wrote: > > Matt Schuckmann wrote: > > > > > 1. There is a --brief option for the diff command that gives a small > > > amount of information on the differing files, i.e. Repository file > > > name, revisions and some useless text about some temporary files. > > > > Yes, the mentioning of temp files has definitely degraded the > > usefulness of the command. It wasn't always this way. > > > > > > > It doesn't appear that this option is in the documentation but I > > > could have missed it, it's definatly not documented in the online > > > help. Also it appears that this option doesn't work for the rdiff > > > command which is too bad, perhaps this is a known bug. > > > > In the cvshome cvs: "cvs -H diff" documents the --brief option. For > "cvs rdiff" the -s gives a one-liner for each file. See cvs -H rdiff". > > > I'm pretty sure this used to work at some point. > > > > > > > > > 2. Apparently in the past CVS users have been advised to apply a both > > > a branch point tag and a branch tag whenever a branch is made, just to > > > facilitate this type of operation. > > > Is this still the case? > > > If so that's disappointing considering all the wonderful work that > > > has been done with mergepoints it seems that identifying the branch > > > point would be extreamly simple. > > > > > > Is there a reason why CVSNT can't identify the branch point for you? > > > > While we're at it, here's my feature suggestion: > > Introduce some kind of shorthand notation for referring to > > branchpoints, something like > > > > cvs up -r\branch > > > > i.e. use a backslash or whatever other character seems sensible here as > > prefix to the branch name. > > > > Cheers, > -- > Charles L. Farbstein > Titan Corp. > Tactical Services Division > 7436 Mission Valley Road > San Diego, CA 92108 > Phone: (619) 278-2053 > Fax: (619) 278-2070 > E-mail: charlie.farbstein at titan.com >